From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/10] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 10:17:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349446636-8611-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349446636-8611-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
This check is used in multiple places to determine whether we
should check for (and potentially free) post EOF blocks on an
inode. Add a helper to consolidate the check.
Note that when we remove an inode from the cache (xfs_inactive()),
we are required to trim post-EOF blocks even if the inode is marked
preallocated or append-only to maintain correct space accounting.
The 'force' parameter to xfs_can_free_eofblocks() specifies whether
we should ignore the prealloc/append-only status of the inode.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1 +
fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 19 +++++++------------
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index bba8f37..3e6cf11 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -3911,3 +3911,40 @@ xfs_iext_irec_update_extoffs(
ifp->if_u1.if_ext_irec[i].er_extoff += ext_diff;
}
}
+
+/*
+ * Test whether it is appropriate to check an inode for and free post EOF
+ * blocks. The 'force' parameter determines whether we should also consider
+ * regular files that are marked preallocated or append-only.
+ */
+bool
+xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
+{
+ /* prealloc/delalloc exists only on regular files */
+ if (!S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Zero sized files with no cached pages and delalloc blocks will not
+ * have speculative prealloc/delalloc blocks to remove.
+ */
+ if (VFS_I(ip)->i_size == 0 &&
+ VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) == 0 &&
+ ip->i_delayed_blks == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ /* If we haven't read in the extent list, then don't do it now. */
+ if (!(ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Do not free real preallocated or append-only files unless the file
+ * has delalloc blocks and we are forced to remove them.
+ */
+ if (ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND))
+ if (!force || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index b3dabe9..0745c07 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ void xfs_iext_irec_compact(xfs_ifork_t *);
void xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages(xfs_ifork_t *);
void xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(xfs_ifork_t *);
void xfs_iext_irec_update_extoffs(xfs_ifork_t *, int, int);
+bool xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *, bool);
#define xfs_ipincount(ip) ((unsigned int) atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount))
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
index d8ce502..1f3c53d8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
@@ -436,11 +436,7 @@ xfs_release(
if (ip->i_d.di_nlink == 0)
return 0;
- if ((S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
- (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
- (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
- (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) &&
- (!(ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)))) {
+ if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, false)) {
/*
* If we can't get the iolock just skip truncating the blocks
@@ -516,13 +512,12 @@ xfs_inactive(
goto out;
if (ip->i_d.di_nlink != 0) {
- if ((S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
- (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
- (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
- (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) &&
- (!(ip->i_d.di_flags &
- (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) ||
- ip->i_delayed_blks != 0))) {
+ /*
+ * force is true because we are evicting an inode from the
+ * cache. Post-eof blocks must be freed, lest we end up with
+ * broken free space accounting.
+ */
+ if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, true)) {
error = xfs_free_eofblocks(mp, ip, false);
if (error)
return VN_INACTIVE_CACHE;
--
1.7.7.6
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 14:17 [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2012-10-23 0:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xfs: make xfs_free_eofblocks() non-static, return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-10-11 14:13 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-11 22:35 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-15 22:46 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-15 23:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-16 1:39 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-17 22:40 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-18 12:16 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-18 15:46 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-18 16:23 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-22 7:34 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-22 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-22 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-24 16:16 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-24 19:27 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xfs: make xfs_quota_type() non-static Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xfs: add quota id filtering to eofblocks scan Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-24 16:18 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-24 19:41 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-24 23:02 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-25 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25 0:29 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] xfs: add minimum file size " Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] xfs: add background scanning to clear eofblocks inodes Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-21 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 20:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 19:10 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349446636-8611-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.