From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE655E00292 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2012 19:33:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,593,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="235480700" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.132]) ([10.255.14.132]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2012 19:33:10 -0700 Message-ID: <1350354790.27257.21.camel@empanada> From: Tom Zanussi To: Saul Wold Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:33:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <507CA199.2000509@linux.intel.com> References: <83af67a8e717a631355c0deed80cf64969b8ae99.1350070372.git.tom.zanussi@intel.com> <507CA199.2000509@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: dvhart@linux.intel.com, poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] packagegroup-core-tools-profile: replace 'legacy' lttng with lttng 2.0 X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:33:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 16:51 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 10/12/2012 12:53 PM, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi > > > > packagegroup-core-tools-profile currently pulls in the 'legacy' lttng > > packages, which are useless without legacy lttng support in the kernel. > > > > This makes packagegroup-core-tools-profile pull in the lttng 2.0 > > packages instead, which don't need any kernel modifications to work. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi > > --- > > .../packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb > > index 1035036..bf6e16e 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb > > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > > SUMMARY = "Profiling tools" > > LICENSE = "MIT" > > > > -PR = "r1" > > +PR = "r2" > > > > inherit packagegroup > > > > @@ -29,8 +29,9 @@ PROFILETOOLS = "\ > > oprofileui-server \ > > powertop \ > > latencytop \ > > - lttng-control \ > > - lttng-viewer" > > + lttng-tools \ > > + lttng-modules \ > > + babeltrace" > > > Not sure this will work since babeltrace is not buildable for mips machines. > Yeah, I guess things like this are another reason it hasn't been switched over (though I wouldn't have expected a userspace translation tool to be the thing that choked on mips). So might as well hold off on this until I can test lttng on all the arches. Tom > Sau! > > > # systemtap needs elfutils which is not fully buildable on uclibc > > # hence we exclude it from uclibc based builds > > @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ SYSTEMTAP_mips = "" > > # which means we can not use syscall() to call it. So we ignore > > # it for x86_64/uclibc > > > > -LTTNGUST = "lttng-ust" > > +LTTNGUST = "lttng2-ust" > > LTTNGUST_libc-uclibc = "" > > LTTNGUST_mips = "" > > > >