From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TObNV-00047Q-Gh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:42:13 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9HLSqvl010192; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:28:52 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08886-10; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:28:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9HLSgYj010186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:28:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1350509329.2185.136.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:28:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1350500844-10356-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH V2] eglibc-2.16: Use tar ball instead of svn SRC_URI X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:42:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Adapt the recipes to fetch a tarball. > Tarball is generated from latest 2.16 branch > which has e500-math_private.patch already applied > hence we remove that patch. > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > What the motivation to move to the tarball? svn:// recipes depend on subversion-native. Having switched to the new ubversion version, we've in a nasty position of it being hard to ASSUME_PROVIDED with the API breakage. Building subversion-native is a pain and delays the core part of the build significantly. Switching to tarball recipes should improve our build speed a lot. So its mainly for performance reasons that we should do this. My only question is whether we need to include the svn revision in the tarball name? Cheers, Richard