From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] libxl: take node distances into account during NUMA placement
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:00:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350666041.6053.69.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09276c114a9a3dcc6058.1350657294@Solace>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 891 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:34 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, among placement candidates with the same number of nodes, the
> closer the various nodes are to each others, the better the performances
> for a domain placed there.
>
So, it seems we need to discuss a bit more about this patch... Please,
ignore it for now.
OTOH, patches 2 and 3 can be considered for further review/ack/commit,
even without this one, as they are pretty much unrelated from this one
(and within each other). I'd expect them to apply cleanly, but if I need
to rebase and resend, let me know.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 14:34 [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Some small NUMA placement improvements Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] libxl: take node distances into account during NUMA placement Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 17:00 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] libxl, xl: user can ask for min and max nodes to use during placement Dario Faggioli
2012-11-12 16:26 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-12 16:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v2] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350666041.6053.69.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.