From: ling.ma.program@gmail.com
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iant@google.com, Ma Ling <ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC V2] [x86] Optimize small size memcpy by avoding long latency from decode stage
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:00:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350921638-9330-1-git-send-email-ling.ma.program@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Ma Ling <ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
CISC code has higher instruction density, saving memory and
improving i-cache hit rate. However decode become challenge,
only one mulitple-uops(2~3)instruction could be decoded in one cycle,
and instructions containing more 4 uops(rep movsq/b) have to be handled by MS-ROM,
the process take long time and eat up the advantage from it for small size.
In order to avoid this disavantage, we take use of general instruction code
for small size copy. The result shows it can get 1~2x improvement
on Core2, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Atom, and Bulldozer as well.
Signed-off-by: Ma Ling <ling.ma.program@gmail.com>
---
In this version we decrease warm up distance from 512 to 256 for coming CPUs,
which manage to reduce latency, but long time to decode is still consumed.
Thanks
Ling
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
index 1c273be..6a24c8c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/dwarf2.h>
#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
-
/*
* memcpy - Copy a memory block.
*
@@ -19,6 +18,15 @@
*/
/*
+ * memcpy_c() and memcpy_c_e() use rep movsq/movsb respectively,
+ * the instruction have to get micro ops from Microcode Sequencser Rom.
+ * And the decode process take long latency, in order to avoid it,
+ * we choose loop unrolling routine for small size.
+ * Could vary the warm up distance.
+ */
+
+
+/*
* memcpy_c() - fast string ops (REP MOVSQ) based variant.
*
* This gets patched over the unrolled variant (below) via the
@@ -26,6 +34,8 @@
*/
.section .altinstr_replacement, "ax", @progbits
.Lmemcpy_c:
+ cmpq $256, %rdx
+ jbe memcpy
movq %rdi, %rax
movq %rdx, %rcx
shrq $3, %rcx
@@ -46,6 +56,8 @@
*/
.section .altinstr_replacement, "ax", @progbits
.Lmemcpy_c_e:
+ cmpq $256, %rdx
+ jbe memcpy
movq %rdi, %rax
movq %rdx, %rcx
rep movsb
--
1.6.5.2
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-22 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 16:00 ling.ma.program [this message]
2012-10-22 9:23 ` [PATCH RFC V2] [x86] Optimize small size memcpy by avoding long latency from decode stage Ling Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350921638-9330-1-git-send-email-ling.ma.program@gmail.com \
--to=ling.ma.program@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iant@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.