All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1350949982.30970.11@snotra>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index fcb4133..2f1b1af 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,36 +1,36 @@
 On 10/22/2012 04:18:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
-> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Varun Sethi  
+> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Varun Sethi =20
 > <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com> wrote:
 > > +}
 > > +
 > > +static unsigned long pamu_get_fspi_and_allocate(u32 subwin_cnt)
 > > +{
-> 
+>=20
 > subwin_cnt should probably be an unsigned int.
-> 
+>=20
 > This function needs to be documented.  What value is being returned?
 
 spaact offset (yes, this needs to be documented)
 
 > > +       unsigned long spaace_addr;
 > > +
-> > +       spaace_addr = gen_pool_alloc(spaace_pool, subwin_cnt *  
+> > +       spaace_addr =3D gen_pool_alloc(spaace_pool, subwin_cnt * =20
 > sizeof(paace_t));
 > > +       if (!spaace_addr)
 > > +               return ULONG_MAX;
-> 
+>=20
 > What's wrong with returning 0 on error?
 
 0 is a valid spaact offset
 
 > > +
-> > +       return (spaace_addr - (unsigned long)spaact) /  
+> > +       return (spaace_addr - (unsigned long)spaact) / =20
 > (sizeof(paace_t));
-> 
+>=20
 > Is this supposed to be a virtual address?  If so, then return void*
 > instead of an unsigned long.
 
-It's not a virtual address.  How often does subtraction followed by  
+It's not a virtual address.  How often does subtraction followed by =20
 division result in a valid virtual address?
 
 > > +int  pamu_update_paace_stash(int liodn, u32 subwin, u32 value)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Whitespace
 
 > > +#define PAMU_PAGE_SHIFT 12
 > > +#define PAMU_PAGE_SIZE  4096ULL
-> 
+>=20
 > 4096ULL?  Why not just 4096?
 
 This lets it be used in phys_addr_t expressions without needing casts
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ everywhere or dropping bits.
 > > + * to the IOMMU API.
 > > + */
 > > +#define FSL_PAMU_PGSIZES       (~0xFFFUL)
-> 
-> There should be a better way to define this.  ~(PAMU_PAGE_SIZE-1)  
+>=20
+> There should be a better way to define this.  ~(PAMU_PAGE_SIZE-1) =20
 > maybe?
 
 Is it even true?  We don't support IOMMU pages larger than the SoC can
@@ -59,41 +59,41 @@ address.
 The (~0xFFFUL) version also discards some valid IOMMU page sizes on
 32-bit kernels.  One use case for windows larger than the CPU virtual
 address space is creating one big identity-map window to effectively
-disable translation.  If we're to support that, the size of  
+disable translation.  If we're to support that, the size of =20
 pgsize_bitmap
 will need to change as well.
 
 > > +static int map_liodn(int liodn, struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain)
 > > +{
-> > +       u32 subwin_cnt = dma_domain->subwin_cnt;
+> > +       u32 subwin_cnt =3D dma_domain->subwin_cnt;
 > > +       unsigned long rpn;
-> > +       int ret = 0, i;
+> > +       int ret =3D 0, i;
 > > +
 > > +       if (subwin_cnt) {
-> > +               struct dma_subwindow *sub_win_ptr =
+> > +               struct dma_subwindow *sub_win_ptr =3D
 > > +                                       &dma_domain->sub_win_arr[0];
-> > +               for (i = 0; i < subwin_cnt; i++) {
+> > +               for (i =3D 0; i < subwin_cnt; i++) {
 > > +                       if (sub_win_ptr[i].valid) {
-> > +                               rpn = sub_win_ptr[i].paddr >>
+> > +                               rpn =3D sub_win_ptr[i].paddr >>
 > > +                                        PAMU_PAGE_SHIFT,
 > > +                               spin_lock(&iommu_lock);
-> > +                               ret = pamu_config_spaace(liodn,  
+> > +                               ret =3D pamu_config_spaace(liodn, =20
 > subwin_cnt, i,
-> > +                                                         
+> > +                                                        =20
 > sub_win_ptr[i].size,
 > > +                                                        -1,
 > > +                                                        rpn,
-> > +                                                         
+> > +                                                        =20
 > dma_domain->snoop_id,
-> > +                                                         
+> > +                                                        =20
 > dma_domain->stash_id,
-> > +                                                        (i > 0) ?  
+> > +                                                        (i > 0) ? =20
 > 1 : 0,
-> > +                                                         
+> > +                                                        =20
 > sub_win_ptr[i].prot);
 > > +                               spin_unlock(&iommu_lock);
 > > +                               if (ret) {
-> > +                                       pr_err("PAMU SPAACE  
+> > +                                       pr_err("PAMU SPAACE =20
 > configuration failed for liodn %d\n",
 > > +                                                liodn);
 > > +                                       return ret;
@@ -104,25 +104,25 @@ will need to change as well.
 Break up that nesting with some subfunctions.
 
 > > +       while (!list_empty(&dma_domain->devices)) {
-> > +               info = list_entry(dma_domain->devices.next,
+> > +               info =3D list_entry(dma_domain->devices.next,
 > > +                       struct device_domain_info, link);
 > > +               remove_domain_ref(info, dma_domain->subwin_cnt);
 > > +       }
-> 
+>=20
 > I wonder if you should use list_for_each_safe() instead.
 
 The above is simpler if you're destroying the entire list.
 
 > > +}
 > > +
-> > +static int configure_domain_dma_state(struct fsl_dma_domain  
+> > +static int configure_domain_dma_state(struct fsl_dma_domain =20
 > *dma_domain, int enable)
-> 
+>=20
 > bool enable
-> 
-> Finally, please CC: me on all IOMMU and PAMU patches you post  
+>=20
+> Finally, please CC: me on all IOMMU and PAMU patches you post =20
 > upstream.
 
 Me too.
 
--Scott
+-Scott=
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 4e56628..923025e 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,45 +4,45 @@
  "Date\0Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:53:02 -0500\0"
  "To\0Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Sethi Varun-B16395 <B16395@freescale.com>"
-  joerg.roedel@amd.com <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
   iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
   linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
- " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+ " joerg.roedel@amd.com <joerg.roedel@amd.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 10/22/2012 04:18:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:\n"
- "> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Varun Sethi  \n"
+ "> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Varun Sethi =20\n"
  "> <Varun.Sethi@freescale.com> wrote:\n"
  "> > +}\n"
  "> > +\n"
  "> > +static unsigned long pamu_get_fspi_and_allocate(u32 subwin_cnt)\n"
  "> > +{\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> subwin_cnt should probably be an unsigned int.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> This function needs to be documented.  What value is being returned?\n"
  "\n"
  "spaact offset (yes, this needs to be documented)\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +       unsigned long spaace_addr;\n"
  "> > +\n"
- "> > +       spaace_addr = gen_pool_alloc(spaace_pool, subwin_cnt *  \n"
+ "> > +       spaace_addr =3D gen_pool_alloc(spaace_pool, subwin_cnt * =20\n"
  "> sizeof(paace_t));\n"
  "> > +       if (!spaace_addr)\n"
  "> > +               return ULONG_MAX;\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> What's wrong with returning 0 on error?\n"
  "\n"
  "0 is a valid spaact offset\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +\n"
- "> > +       return (spaace_addr - (unsigned long)spaact) /  \n"
+ "> > +       return (spaace_addr - (unsigned long)spaact) / =20\n"
  "> (sizeof(paace_t));\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Is this supposed to be a virtual address?  If so, then return void*\n"
  "> instead of an unsigned long.\n"
  "\n"
- "It's not a virtual address.  How often does subtraction followed by  \n"
+ "It's not a virtual address.  How often does subtraction followed by =20\n"
  "division result in a valid virtual address?\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +int  pamu_update_paace_stash(int liodn, u32 subwin, u32 value)\n"
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
  "\n"
  "> > +#define PAMU_PAGE_SHIFT 12\n"
  "> > +#define PAMU_PAGE_SIZE  4096ULL\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> 4096ULL?  Why not just 4096?\n"
  "\n"
  "This lets it be used in phys_addr_t expressions without needing casts\n"
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
  "> > + * to the IOMMU API.\n"
  "> > + */\n"
  "> > +#define FSL_PAMU_PGSIZES       (~0xFFFUL)\n"
- "> \n"
- "> There should be a better way to define this.  ~(PAMU_PAGE_SIZE-1)  \n"
+ ">=20\n"
+ "> There should be a better way to define this.  ~(PAMU_PAGE_SIZE-1) =20\n"
  "> maybe?\n"
  "\n"
  "Is it even true?  We don't support IOMMU pages larger than the SoC can\n"
@@ -71,41 +71,41 @@
  "The (~0xFFFUL) version also discards some valid IOMMU page sizes on\n"
  "32-bit kernels.  One use case for windows larger than the CPU virtual\n"
  "address space is creating one big identity-map window to effectively\n"
- "disable translation.  If we're to support that, the size of  \n"
+ "disable translation.  If we're to support that, the size of =20\n"
  "pgsize_bitmap\n"
  "will need to change as well.\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +static int map_liodn(int liodn, struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain)\n"
  "> > +{\n"
- "> > +       u32 subwin_cnt = dma_domain->subwin_cnt;\n"
+ "> > +       u32 subwin_cnt =3D dma_domain->subwin_cnt;\n"
  "> > +       unsigned long rpn;\n"
- "> > +       int ret = 0, i;\n"
+ "> > +       int ret =3D 0, i;\n"
  "> > +\n"
  "> > +       if (subwin_cnt) {\n"
- "> > +               struct dma_subwindow *sub_win_ptr =\n"
+ "> > +               struct dma_subwindow *sub_win_ptr =3D\n"
  "> > +                                       &dma_domain->sub_win_arr[0];\n"
- "> > +               for (i = 0; i < subwin_cnt; i++) {\n"
+ "> > +               for (i =3D 0; i < subwin_cnt; i++) {\n"
  "> > +                       if (sub_win_ptr[i].valid) {\n"
- "> > +                               rpn = sub_win_ptr[i].paddr >>\n"
+ "> > +                               rpn =3D sub_win_ptr[i].paddr >>\n"
  "> > +                                        PAMU_PAGE_SHIFT,\n"
  "> > +                               spin_lock(&iommu_lock);\n"
- "> > +                               ret = pamu_config_spaace(liodn,  \n"
+ "> > +                               ret =3D pamu_config_spaace(liodn, =20\n"
  "> subwin_cnt, i,\n"
- "> > +                                                         \n"
+ "> > +                                                        =20\n"
  "> sub_win_ptr[i].size,\n"
  "> > +                                                        -1,\n"
  "> > +                                                        rpn,\n"
- "> > +                                                         \n"
+ "> > +                                                        =20\n"
  "> dma_domain->snoop_id,\n"
- "> > +                                                         \n"
+ "> > +                                                        =20\n"
  "> dma_domain->stash_id,\n"
- "> > +                                                        (i > 0) ?  \n"
+ "> > +                                                        (i > 0) ? =20\n"
  "> 1 : 0,\n"
- "> > +                                                         \n"
+ "> > +                                                        =20\n"
  "> sub_win_ptr[i].prot);\n"
  "> > +                               spin_unlock(&iommu_lock);\n"
  "> > +                               if (ret) {\n"
- "> > +                                       pr_err(\"PAMU SPAACE  \n"
+ "> > +                                       pr_err(\"PAMU SPAACE =20\n"
  "> configuration failed for liodn %d\\n\",\n"
  "> > +                                                liodn);\n"
  "> > +                                       return ret;\n"
@@ -116,27 +116,27 @@
  "Break up that nesting with some subfunctions.\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +       while (!list_empty(&dma_domain->devices)) {\n"
- "> > +               info = list_entry(dma_domain->devices.next,\n"
+ "> > +               info =3D list_entry(dma_domain->devices.next,\n"
  "> > +                       struct device_domain_info, link);\n"
  "> > +               remove_domain_ref(info, dma_domain->subwin_cnt);\n"
  "> > +       }\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> I wonder if you should use list_for_each_safe() instead.\n"
  "\n"
  "The above is simpler if you're destroying the entire list.\n"
  "\n"
  "> > +}\n"
  "> > +\n"
- "> > +static int configure_domain_dma_state(struct fsl_dma_domain  \n"
+ "> > +static int configure_domain_dma_state(struct fsl_dma_domain =20\n"
  "> *dma_domain, int enable)\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> bool enable\n"
- "> \n"
- "> Finally, please CC: me on all IOMMU and PAMU patches you post  \n"
+ ">=20\n"
+ "> Finally, please CC: me on all IOMMU and PAMU patches you post =20\n"
  "> upstream.\n"
  "\n"
  "Me too.\n"
  "\n"
- -Scott
+ -Scott=
 
-a9cf65ce7a710b5c4738440683e096698a1481ee4826e335895b9108c1eebb90
+5df8d2d3cc4b08de1dffd621af5c7ccdfdd9498f471ff97e4bf7f35e2658418c

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.