All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ohering@suse.com,
	hch@infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Drivers: scsi
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:25:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351117520.2494.8.camel@dabdike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351095938-12204-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com>

On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 09:25 -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> When the low level driver returns SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY,
> how is the command retried; I suspect the retry is done after some delay.

Delay depends mainly on I/O pressure and the unplug timer in the block
layer.

> Is this delay programmable? If the device state changes,
> can the low level driver notify upper layers that it can now handle
> the command that it had failed earlier with SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY.

In theory, you can call blk_run_queue() from the event handler that sees
the device become ready.  I don't think any driver actually does this,
but I can't see it would cause any problem.

James

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 16:25 Drivers: scsi K. Y. Srinivasan
2012-10-24 22:25 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2012-10-24 22:34   ` KY Srinivasan
2012-10-24 22:34     ` KY Srinivasan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-03 16:40 K. Y. Srinivasan
2012-11-04  9:39 ` James Bottomley
2012-11-04  9:39   ` James Bottomley
2012-11-04 15:26   ` KY Srinivasan
2012-11-04 15:26     ` KY Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1351117520.2494.8.camel@dabdike \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohering@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.