From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Little, Morgan" <Morgan.Little@windriver.com>,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
Joe MacDonald <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 3/3] ntp: Clean up recipes
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:44:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1351871056.4358.109.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2240810.9tyY23JxNH@helios>
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 09:59 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I'm not sure that it does. I think the split was made just to avoid bringing
> in OpenSSL on systems where it was not needed or desired. Phil Blundell (on
> CC) made the split quite a while ago in OE-Classic - Phil can you comment?
Yes, exactly. If ntpdate is the only thing on the system that's linked
with openssl then it ends up dragging in several times its own weight in
dependencies. And, for most people, having SSL-secured time is not that
much of a priority since the time server is typically on a trusted local
network.
p.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-23 16:20 [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 0/3] ntp updates Morgan Little
2012-10-23 16:20 ` [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 1/3] ntp: Move from meta-oe to meta-networking Morgan Little
2012-10-23 16:20 ` [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 2/3] ntp: Uprev from 4.2.6p3 to 4.2.6p5 Morgan Little
2012-10-23 16:20 ` [meta-oe][meta-networking][PATCH V2 3/3] ntp: Clean up recipes Morgan Little
2012-11-01 1:08 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-01 5:50 ` Martin Ertsås
2012-11-01 14:31 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-01 17:09 ` Little, Morgan
2012-11-01 17:19 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-01 17:32 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 7:00 ` Martin Ertsås
2012-11-02 13:01 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 13:09 ` Martin Ertsås
2012-11-02 13:14 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 9:59 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-02 13:07 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 13:38 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-02 14:02 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 14:10 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-02 14:14 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-02 17:26 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-04 18:43 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-09 14:55 ` Little, Morgan
2012-11-09 15:04 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-11-10 13:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-02 21:09 ` Phil Blundell
2012-11-02 15:44 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1351871056.4358.109.camel@x121e.pbcl.net \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com \
--cc=Morgan.Little@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.