From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
To: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>, Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/13] HW-latency: Differentiate three modes to use CPU carry out testing
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:59:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352080784-30839-5-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352080784-30839-1-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com>
0: all online cpus
1: any one of online cpus
2: all online cpus sequentially run test
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
---
drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c b/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
index 8a8c6ba..4303644 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/hw_latency_test.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static unsigned long buf_size = 262144UL;
static struct task_struct *kthread;
struct sample {
+ unsigned int cpu;
u64 seqnum;
u64 duration;
struct timespec timestamp;
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ static struct data {
static ktime_t now;
struct sample_function {
const char *name;
+ u8 type; /* 0=all parallel, 1=anyone, 2=all sequential*/
struct list_head list;
int (*get_sample)(void *unused);
};
@@ -186,14 +188,11 @@ static int get_freq_sample(void *unused)
u32 sample = 0;
int ret = 1;
unsigned int cpu_tsc_freq;
- static DEFINE_MUTEX(freq_pit_mutex);
start = ktime_get();
do {
t1 = ktime_get();
- mutex_lock(&freq_pit_mutex);
cpu_tsc_freq = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
- mutex_unlock(&freq_pit_mutex);
t2 = ktime_get();
total = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(t2, start));
diff = abs(cpu_tsc_freq - tsc_khz);
@@ -249,23 +248,30 @@ out:
struct sample_function tsc_sample = {
.name = "tsc",
+ .type = 0,
.get_sample = get_tsc_sample,
};
struct sample_function tsc_freq_sample = {
.name = "freq",
+ .type = 2,
.get_sample = get_freq_sample,
};
struct sample_function random_bytes_sample = {
.name = "random_bytes",
+ .type = 0,
.get_sample = get_random_bytes_sample,
};
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(testing_cpu_map, NR_CPUS);
+
static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
{
int err = 0;
u64 interval = 0;
+ int cpu;
+ struct cpumask *testing_cpu_mask = to_cpumask(testing_cpu_map);
int (*get_sample)(void *unused);
mutex_lock(&sample_function_mutex);
@@ -274,10 +280,31 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
else
goto out;
+ cpumask_or(testing_cpu_mask, testing_cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
mutex_lock(&data.lock);
-
- err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ switch (current_sample_func->type) {
+ case 0:
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, testing_cpu_mask);
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, NULL);
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
+ cpumask_clear(testing_cpu_mask);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, testing_cpu_mask);
+ err = stop_machine(get_sample, unused, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ mutex_unlock(&data.lock);
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+
if (err) {
mutex_unlock(&data.lock);
goto err_out;
--
1.7.12.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-04 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 1:59 [PATCH 00/13] A simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughtput ver 0.10 Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 01/13] HW-latency: hardware latency test 0.10 Luming Yu
2012-11-04 21:07 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-05 12:14 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-04 21:23 ` John Kacur
2012-11-05 12:20 ` Luming Yu
2012-11-05 8:44 ` No recipient
2012-11-05 8:44 ` Ove Karlsen
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 02/13] HW-latency: Fix a lockdep warnning Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 03/13] HW-latency: Use get_random_bytes_arch Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` Luming Yu [this message]
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 05/13] HW-latency: Add CPU field in sample output Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 06/13] HW-latency: cycle through all online cpus to re-test cpufreq Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] HW-latency: delete too many "Fast TSC calibration using PIT" in cpufreq sampling Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] HW-latency: A stupid memory scanner for raw memory latency test Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] HW-latency: Fix unwanted crash caused by write to dummy debugfs interface Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] HW-latency: add address range for x86-32 Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] HW-latency: fix a warnning in previous patch Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] HW-latency: Add sample unit in sample data Luming Yu
2012-11-05 1:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] HW-latency: some sample data format change Luming Yu
2012-11-08 16:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] A simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughtput ver 0.10 Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352080784-30839-5-git-send-email-luming.yu@gmail.com \
--to=luming.yu@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luming.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.