Re: powerpc: Don't silently handle machine checks from userspace

[Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>]

On 11/06/2012 03:21:37 AM, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottwood@freescale.com]
> > > Therefore I request to put this check back, and even to put the
> > > removed code at the top of the machine check handler because =20
> there is
> > > no point in trying to recover from a user space bus error anyway.
> >
> > Why is there no point trying to recover?  For example, see =20
> MCSR_ICPERR
> > and MCSR_DCPERR_MC in machine_check_e500mc.  The machine check is =20
> just
> > letting us know that there was an error and the read-only cache got
> > dumped (i.e. it was a correctable error).
>=20
> Oh I overlooked those cases; those correctable errors shouldn't be =20
> bus errors for the user space process?
>=20
> Hmm I guess there is no simple solution then, since the "recover" =20
> function also prints the kernel messages about the machine check =20
> being in kernel mode without having checked whether it really was in =20
> kernel mode. In the past the user mode check was in between.

It shouldn't be that difficult to make it say "in user mode" or "in =20
kernel mode" depending on which it was... or just remove that phrase =20
altogether and let the following output indicate whether it was in =20
kernel mode.

-Scott=