Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>]

On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:15 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> James wrote:
> >> [I'd like to see] a genuine public apology for the libel...
> >> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of
> this
> >> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.

Hey that's a complete misrepresentation.  I expressed no such opinion in
the email.

What I said was:

> I would really appreciate it if the next email I see from you on this
> subject is either
> 
>      1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
>         we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
>      2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
>         prevail on RTS to accept.
> 
> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.

That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
facts.  It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.

James