From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung at gmail.com>
To: powertop@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Powertop] [PATCH] Change library/pkg search condition for libnl2/3
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:30:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352820659.1811.5.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20121113101840.GB2621@swordfish.minsk.epam.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2554 bytes --]
2012-11-13 (화), 13:18 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky:
> On (11/13/12 17:47), Austin Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > why we check 'libnl-3.0 >= 3.0 libnl-genl-3.0 >= 3.0' and only
> > 'libnl-2.0',
> > Because for v2, it just have�separated�libnl-genl library, but there were
> > no�separated pkg named�libnl-genl-2.0.
> > >+AC_SEARCH_LIBS([genl_connect], [nl-genl nl], [], [has_libnl_ver=0])
> > With additional 'nl' checking, It doesn't help. Failed with same error
> > under both v3 and v2 cases for 12.04 (doesn't try others).�
> > If fact, genl_connect is in nl-genl both for v2 and v3. Not sure if it is
> > some search path issue.�
> >
>
> hm. ok, thanks for info. I'll check libnl 2.0 repo if they ever had pkg-config file
> other than libnl-2.0.pc. If the only one they provide is libnl-2.0.pc then we'll stick
> with inital PKG_CHECK_MODULES rework and your adjustment to libnl-2.0 case.
>
> thanks for your patience and help!
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> configure.ac | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index b8c183f..e6ae3ce 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -54,15 +54,11 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([PCIUTILS], [libpci],[has_libpci=1],[
>
>
> has_libnl_ver=0
> -PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-3.0 libnl-genl-3.0], [
> - has_libnl_ver=3], [
> - AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl-3 nl-genl-3], [
> - has_libnl_ver=3], [
> - AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl], [
> - has_libnl_ver=2], [
> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1], [has_libnl_ver=1], [])])])])
> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-3.0 >= 3.0 libnl-genl-3.0 >= 3.0], [has_libnl_ver=3], [
> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-2.0 >= 2.0], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1.0], [has_libnl_ver=1], [has_libnl_ver=0])])])
On my ubuntu 10.04, "libnl-1.0" didn't work but "libnl-1" did.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> if (test "$has_libnl_ver" -eq 0); then
> - AC_MSG_ERROR(libnl is required but not found)
> + AC_MSG_ERROR(libnl and libnl-genl are required but were not found)
> fi
> if (test "$has_libnl_ver" -gt 1); then
> AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBNL20], [1], [Define if you have libnl-2.0 or higher])
>
> _______________________________________________
> PowerTop mailing list
> PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop
--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-13 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 15:30 Namhyung Kim [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-13 10:18 [Powertop] [PATCH] Change library/pkg search condition for libnl2/3 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-13 9:49 Austin Zhang
2012-11-13 9:47 Austin Zhang
2012-11-13 9:26 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-13 9:06 Austin Zhang
2012-11-12 9:09 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 15:25 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 15:19 Austin Zhang
2012-11-09 13:01 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 12:18 Austin Zhang
2012-11-09 12:07 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 11:47 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 11:43 Austin Zhang
2012-11-09 11:30 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 11:17 Austin Zhang
2012-11-09 11:01 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-09 10:56 Austin Zhang
2012-11-08 14:09 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-05 10:51 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-05 10:24 Sergey Senozhatsky
2012-11-02 14:32 Ferron, Chris E
2012-11-02 12:30 zhang.austin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352820659.1811.5.camel@leonhard \
--to=powertop@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.