Re: verifying git file contents without checking out history?

[Marc Weber <marco-oweber@gmx.de>]

Excerpts from Junio C Hamano's message of Mon Nov 19 05:55:18 +0100 2012:
> Define what you mean by "contents".
contents = the files git archive HEAD would put into an archive, those
determining a build result.

How could the repo be compromised:
1) An attacker triest to find a hash collision in the HEAD tree.
  However finding a hash collision which also is a useful attack should
  be very hard.

2) The attacker modifies a file the way he likes (thus the attack is
  easy), then he tries to modify the history in a way causing the same 
  commit hash.
  Probably this is very hard, too.

Does this make sense? I feared that having a HEAD^ you can manipulate to
change the hash of HEAD makes it easier to cause a collision without the
user noticing. 
However adding additional useless files to HEAD could be used to cause a
imaginary hash collision, too. Thus having a second hash would not be of
any benefit. Thus referring to commit by hash (using all hash digits) is
best you can do. I finally got it.

Thanks
Marc Weber