From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [i-g-t PATCH 4/4] flip_test: switch to using monotonic timestamps
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:07:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1353593252.11370.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uF8v1S9oO+9-OKrxytk4y0Eb6K9DqkWrkB=yr=Jv4XVkA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 15:04 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > + enable_monotonic_timestamp(!(flags & TEST_TIMESTAMP_REAL));
> >>
> >> I don't follow why we should enable monotonic timestamps for some tests
> >> and not for some others? Shouldn't all tests with TEST_CHECK_TS just use
> >> the same clock the kernel uses?
> >
> > The idea was to also test the compatibility mode, where we get real
> > timestamps.
>
> Oh, I've missed that you write back the desired value. I don't think
> we need to test the compat mode if it's not enabled, just test
> whatever mode is enabled. That way we also check whether the getcap
> interface works.
Ok, will do so. We have to wait though until DRM_CAP_TIMESTAMP_MONOTONIC
is added to libdrm. I've sent already a patch for this.
--Imre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-22 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-22 13:25 [i-g-t PATCH 0/4] flip_test: support for monotonic timestamps Imre Deak
2012-11-22 13:25 ` [i-g-t PATCH 1/4] flip_test: add wf-vblank test for expired sequence Imre Deak
2012-11-22 13:25 ` [i-g-t PATCH 2/4] flip_test: skip check for last_received_ts for the first event Imre Deak
2012-11-22 13:25 ` [i-g-t PATCH 3/4] flip_test: use monotonic time to measure the test duration Imre Deak
2012-11-22 13:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-22 13:25 ` [i-g-t PATCH 4/4] flip_test: switch to using monotonic timestamps Imre Deak
2012-11-22 13:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-22 13:50 ` Imre Deak
2012-11-22 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-22 14:07 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2012-11-22 14:46 ` [i-g-t PATCH 4/4] flip_test: switch to using monotonic timestamps (v2) Imre Deak
2012-11-22 20:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-02-11 16:32 ` [PATCH] lib/scatterlist: add simple page iterator Imre Deak
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
2013-02-11 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-12 17:07 ` Imre Deak
2013-02-12 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 14:51 ` Imre Deak
2013-02-12 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-13 15:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Imre Deak
2013-02-13 15:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/scatterlist: use page iterator in the mapping iterator Imre Deak
2013-02-21 13:58 ` [PATCH v4] " Imre Deak
2013-02-24 11:05 ` [PATCH v5] " Imre Deak
2013-02-27 2:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-23 4:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " Stephen Warren
2013-02-23 20:04 ` Imre Deak
2013-02-23 23:45 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1353593252.11370.5.camel@localhost \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.