From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeDhc-0006rY-2g for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:39:33 +0100 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TeDTp-0007QD-9i; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:25:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1354231510.2452.5.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Martin Jansa Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:25:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tune-*: add PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS entries starting with specific ARMPKGARCH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:39:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 00:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-arm920t = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv4t} arm920tt" > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-arm926ejs = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5te} arm926ejste" > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-arm9tdmi = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv4t} arm9tdmit" The last thing in each of those lines looks a bit weird. Not that I'm saying that I think they're wrong, necessarily, but can you explain what exactly they mean and why they are a sensible thing to have? p.