diff for duplicates of <1354553228.2960.4@snotra> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3c756ee..db72f60 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ On 12/01/2012 07:58:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > In BookE, EPCR is defined and valid when either the HV or the 64bit > category are implemented. Reflect this in the field definition. -> +>=20 > Today the only KVM target on 64bit is HV enabled, so there is no > change in actual source code, but this keeps the code closer to the > spec and doesn't build up artificial road blocks for a PR KVM @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ On 12/01/2012 07:58:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 +++++++-- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -> -> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h +>=20 +> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h =20 > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 62fbd38..3480526 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ On 12/01/2012 07:58:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > u32 epsc; > u32 oldpir; > #endif -> +>=20 > +#if defined(CONFIG_BOOKE) > +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV) || defined(CONFIG_64BIT) > + u32 shadow_epcr; @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ On 12/01/2012 07:58:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > +#endif > +#endif -On a PR-mode implementation, why would we be have a shadow_epcr? It -would always be set based on the host kernel, just like when running +On a PR-mode implementation, why would we be have a shadow_epcr? It =20 +would always be set based on the host kernel, just like when running =20 any other userspace process. --Scott +-Scott= diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fe60eea..af165de 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ "ref\01354370305-12344-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de\0" "From\0Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Make EPCR a valid field for booke64 and bookehv\0" - "Date\0Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:47:08 +0000\0" + "Date\0Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:47:08 -0600\0" "To\0Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>\0" - "Cc\0kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" - kvm@vger.kernel.org list <kvm@vger.kernel.org> + "Cc\0Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>" linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org - " Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>\0" + kvm@vger.kernel.org list <kvm@vger.kernel.org> + " kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 12/01/2012 07:58:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:\n" "> In BookE, EPCR is defined and valid when either the HV or the 64bit\n" "> category are implemented. Reflect this in the field definition.\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "> Today the only KVM target on 64bit is HV enabled, so there is no\n" "> change in actual source code, but this keeps the code closer to the\n" "> spec and doesn't build up artificial road blocks for a PR KVM\n" @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ "> ---\n" "> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 +++++++--\n" "> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n" - "> \n" - "> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h \n" + ">=20\n" + "> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h =20\n" "> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h\n" "> index 62fbd38..3480526 100644\n" "> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h\n" @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ "> \tu32 epsc;\n" "> \tu32 oldpir;\n" "> #endif\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "> +#if defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)\n" "> +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV) || defined(CONFIG_64BIT)\n" "> +\tu32 shadow_epcr;\n" @@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ "> +#endif\n" "> +#endif\n" "\n" - "On a PR-mode implementation, why would we be have a shadow_epcr? It \n" - "would always be set based on the host kernel, just like when running \n" + "On a PR-mode implementation, why would we be have a shadow_epcr? It =20\n" + "would always be set based on the host kernel, just like when running =20\n" "any other userspace process.\n" "\n" - -Scott + -Scott= -52a12a607537b53cb5c3569a82e6707062bf6cd5fd2f6de52aea60ddaf5fb7a4 +91826cedea70199c5a998aa6c0db7c7b70960b233ac9c1263d1dd82371ea637c
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index fe60eea..1956969 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ "ref\01354370305-12344-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de\0" "From\0Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Make EPCR a valid field for booke64 and bookehv\0" - "Date\0Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:47:08 +0000\0" + "Date\0Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:47:08 -0600\0" "To\0Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>\0" - "Cc\0kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" + "Cc\0<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" kvm@vger.kernel.org list <kvm@vger.kernel.org> - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org + <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> " Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" @@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ "\n" -Scott -52a12a607537b53cb5c3569a82e6707062bf6cd5fd2f6de52aea60ddaf5fb7a4 +a142ce7697cbffc231a030367d9c98ab73a89d1b101fa7949ac067f1065bdf09
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.