From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1355193671.8733.6.camel@concordia> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: Macros for saving/restore PPR From: Michael Ellerman To: Haren Myneni Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:41:11 +1100 In-Reply-To: <50B41C27.4020905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1351666574.32304.18.camel@hbabu-laptop> <27433.1353641997@neuling.org> <50B41C27.4020905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: paulus@samba.org, anton@au1.ibm.com, Michael Neuling , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 17:49 -0800, Haren Myneni wrote: > On 11/22/2012 07:39 PM, Michael Neuling wrote: > > Haren Myneni wrote: > > > >> [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: Macros for saving/restore PPR > > > > Maybe we should change the names > > HTM_MEDIUM_NO_PPR => HTM_MEDIUM_PPR_DISCARD and > > HTM_MEDIUM_HAS_PPR => HTM_MEDIUM_PPR_SAVE > > But now I'm heading into bike shedding territory... plus I think I > > suggested the names you have currently, so I'm feeling a bit dumb now > > :-) > > No problem, We can change these macro names if HTM_MEDIUM_PPR_DISCARD/ > HTM_MEDIUM_PPR_SAVE gives better description. Yes, those names are better. Even though they're macros they act as functions, so they should preferably be named using a verb. cheers