From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/6] wifi: Don't spam logs with 'Found new beacon' messages.
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:20:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1355350801.9708.24.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355350635.9708.23.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20121212_231701_848012_2B205976)
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 23:17 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 14:15 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 12/12/2012 02:08 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 13:54 -0800, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> > >> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> > >>
> > >> We saw logs fill with this (at very high speeds):
> > >>
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >> cfg80211: Found new beacon on frequency: 5745 MHz (Ch 149) on wiphy0
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> net/wireless/reg.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> index 6e53089..8aa7867 100644
> > >> --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> > >> @@ -2067,11 +2067,12 @@ int regulatory_hint_found_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > >> if (!reg_beacon)
> > >> return -ENOMEM;
> > >>
> > >> - REG_DBG_PRINT("Found new beacon on "
> > >
> > > Why not just disable the config option for it if you don't care?
> >
> > I don't mind seeing it, just don't want thousands of them in my logs
> > in a very short amount of time. Maybe I was just hitting some
> > other bug, and there is no valid reason for this to ever spam?
>
> Quite likely, since I think it's supposed to happen only once for each
> channel unless you reset the regulatory (but that would cause more
> messages? I think?)
Ah, no, I get it. It is related to your many interfaces :-)
The thing is that when a beacon comes in it schedules a work item, and
that work item only sets the beacon_found to true. Now since you have a
ton of interfaces each beacon can be processed many times, and you get a
ton of work items, and ... ouch.
Not sure how the locking works here so can't really suggest a fix right
now.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 21:54 [RFC 1/6] ath9k: Report txerr-filtered errors in debugfs greearb
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 2/6] wifi: Don't spam logs with 'Found new beacon' messages greearb
2012-12-12 22:08 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:15 ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 22:17 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:20 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-12-12 22:24 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-13 20:31 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 3/6] mac80211: Check for NULL in get-ethtool-stats logic greearb
2012-12-12 22:02 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:11 ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 4/6] mac80211: Allow disabling SGI-20 greearb
2012-12-12 22:06 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-12 22:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-12-13 0:58 ` Ben Greear
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 5/6] ath9k: Report rx-crc-errors in ethtool stats greearb
2012-12-12 21:54 ` [RFC 6/6] ath9k: Allow using ath9k-rate-control without forcing it greearb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1355350801.9708.24.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.