From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tix1f-0002jP-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:51:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tix1c-00022Z-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:51:47 -0500 Received: from tx2ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.15]:29501 helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tix1c-00022N-05 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:51:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:51:38 -0600 From: Scott Wood References: <20121212031856.GA26121@buserror.net> In-Reply-To: (from peter.maydell@linaro.org on Wed Dec 12 10:47:04 2012) Message-ID: <1355359898.28445.23@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Allow building without graphics support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann On 12/12/2012 10:47:04 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 12 December 2012 03:18, Scott Wood wrote: > > QEMU is sometimes used in embedded contexts, where graphical support > > is unnecessary. The ability to turn off graphics support not only > > saves some space, but it eliminates the dependency on pixman. >=20 > I would expect that we'd want to use pixman in the emulation > of graphics devices (which should be visible to the guest even > if the host doesn't have display support). And those devices would have a dependency on the QEMU graphics =20 subsystem. Not all targets have graphics devices to be emulated. > > My immediate motivation was that the QEMU-supplied pixman was being =20 > a > > pain to cross compile >=20 > Problems with cross compilation should be reported as bugs > so we can fix them -- we need to fix them anyway for the more > common case where there is host graphics support. Sure. It wasn't meant as a long-term alternative to fixing pixman =20 issues, so much as as a final nudge to do something I'd wanted to do =20 before. -Scott=