From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucas Stach Subject: Re: NVIDIA Tegra DDX Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:12:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1355577168.11327.19.camel@selen> References: <20121210105627.GA7503@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> <2016185.oZ1QsIlQyO@fb07-iapwap2> <20121210123457.GA22428@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121210123457.GA22428-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Marc Dietrich , Michal Suchanek , xorg-devel-go0+a7rfsptAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, den 10.12.2012, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:40:21PM +0100, Marc Dietrich wrote: > > Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 12:01:26 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > > > > Perhaps it could be named xf86-video-tegra-kms or something. > > > > or opentegra (to make clear that this driver is not the closed source one). I > > know this is a bit fanciless but it fits better IMHO. > I actually like the name opentegra as it clearly states what's inside. > I just remembered that back when I started working on Tegra DRM I wrote > some small utilities to help with the reverse engineering and some test > programs. At the time, some other projects were appearing and the trend > seemed to be to reverse the syllables of the original to obtain a new > name. So I went ahead and collectively named the utilities "grate". I'll > throw xf86-video-grate in as another potential candidate. > Now that we've heard some candidates for the naming, can we please come to any conclusion? I would like to start extending the DDX in the next days and it would be really nice to have the naming thing out of the way for this. Regards, Lucas