From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl1GI-0008FG-CX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:47:31 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBIHWfoX029711; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:32:41 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28789-07; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:32:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBIHWXsv029704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:32:34 GMT Message-ID: <1355851953.18874.45.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:32:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1355220771-32095-1-git-send-email-marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> <1355828839.18874.8.camel@ted> <50D0729C.2090703@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches, discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Add 3.7 version of linux-libc-headers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:47:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 08:56 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > W dniu 18.12.2012 14:32, Bruce Ashfield pisze: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Richard Purdie On Tue, > 2012-12-11 > > If we bring this in, I'd prefer to completely drop the 3.4 > kernel > > headers, since having just one recipe in the tree make > sense, and it > > won't tempt us to start having a trail of one libc-header > per kernel > > version (since there's always a layer somewhere that's using > a given > > version). > > > What about a middle ground ? I can pull this into my tree, > since I'm > > doing some 3.8 and 3.4-stable work at the moment, I'll > remove the 3.4 > > kernel headers and then submit it again as part of my queue > with some > > extra tests run ? > > > I am fine with it. > > Thanks, I'll pull this in if Richard agrees. > Sounds like a plan to me. Cheers, Richard