From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlOqD-0001h1-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:58:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlOq9-0003xq-NT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:58:05 -0500 Received: from tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.11]:21333 helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlOq9-0003xd-Gz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:58:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:57:54 -0600 From: Scott Wood In-Reply-To: <50D1853E.7040803@redhat.com> (from kraxel@redhat.com on Wed Dec 19 03:13:34 2012) Message-ID: <1355943474.12062.4@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Allow building without graphics support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Stefan Weil , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/19/2012 03:13:34 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> ./configure > >> =20 > --cross-prefix=3D/home/scott/fsl/tc/gcc-4.5.55-eglibc-2.11.55/powerpc-lin= ux-gnu/bin/powerpc-linux-gnu- > >> > >> && make ? > > > > A few more options than that, but basically yes. > > > > I can get past this particular obstacle by doing something like: > > > > (PATH=3D/home/scott/.../powerpc-linux-gnu/bin:"$PATH" ./configure > > --cross-prefix=3Dpowerpc-linu-gnu- ...) >=20 > Why do you need this? Any tools not picked up correctly if you don't > set the PATH? Which ones? If I don't set the PATH for configure then I get this: ERROR: "powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc" either does not exist or does not work > > ...but then I run into the problem that --extra-cflags and > > --extra-ldflags don't get passed into pixman. >=20 > That should be fixable easily. Have a patch for that? If so, please > send to the list. Otherwise I can have a look. I don't have a patch for it currently. > Why do you need --extra-cflags + --extra-ldflags btw? For selecting the multilib variant (e500v2 SPE versus normal floating =20 point, and eventually I'll probably use it for 32-bit versus 64-bit as =20 well). -Scott=