From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TliAC-000750-Ii for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:36:05 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tlhvy-0000Fo-3U; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:21:18 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Laurentiu Palcu Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:21:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1355933032-25392-1-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> References: <1355933032-25392-1-git-send-email-laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1356016878.24487.187.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pango: have postinstalls run at do_rootfs time X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:36:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:03 +0200, Laurentiu Palcu wrote: > Since pango-native is built anyway and all the modules are in the native > sysroot, create the cache file by scanning those files instead of the > target files. The latter will fail because the shared objects wouldn't > be from the same ELF class. Is it guaranteed that the native build will have the same set of modules? It seems to me that it would be safer to scan the target ones under qemu as you did for gtk-immodules. p.