From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqjgv-0005VT-Kn for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:14:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r03BxPcN012332; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:59:25 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32489-02; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:59:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r03BxCUs012326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:59:14 GMT Message-ID: <1357214354.28649.87.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:59:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1356947154.28649.21.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/26] Next batch, mostly updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:14:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:51 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 31 December 2012 09:45, Richard Purdie > wrote: > >> Noor Ahsan (1): > >> cairo: Adds libxext in X11DEPENDS. > > > > No, we shouldn't be depending on libxext. Ross will not be happy about > > this. See Ross. Ideally we shouldn't have libxext in the images at all. > > Cairo actually uses Xext, because that's where the SHM headers are. I > suspect you're thinking of libXt, which as you say should almost never > be pulled in. Yes, I knew there was something like that but evidently misremembered. The patch is fine then. Cheers, Richard