From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ttyrk-0000zA-5o for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:03:53 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0CAlnvJ026232; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:49 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18272-04; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0CAleBe026225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:42 GMT Message-ID: <1357987662.4072.132.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Saul Wold Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:47:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/28] Automake patches & other fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:04:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 10:14 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > Richard, > > Another batch of automake related changes from Marko (Thanks Marko!) > > Along with some other fixes and patches, I have again included the > cairo patch as I am not sure what your objection to it is. Read the patch description/summary, then the patch contents and see if you think the two match up. It may be a perfectly good patch (perhaps fixing errors with uclibc?) but the explanation doesn't appear to say that, or match the patch at all. I don't know what the mutex bit does. The request is to clarify the patch description. Cheers, Richard