From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TwBf0-0004eh-Ql for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:07:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0ICpeuP008968; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:51:40 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05510-04; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:51:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0ICpUCS008962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:51:31 GMT Message-ID: <1358513490.27799.23.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Jon Szymaniak Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:51:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1355507217.32519.33.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Chris Larson , "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: hg fetcher failures for SRCREV set to a tag X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:07:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:36 -0500, Jon Szymaniak wrote: > >> Hi Richard, > >> > >> Thanks for pinging back on this. (Sorry I just double-sent this to > >> you. Forgot to include the list! :P) > >> > >> I think a fairly simple solution might be to just clone the entire > >> repo by not adding "-r REV" to options[] for an 'hg clone' invocation. > >> The 'hg update' that follows on lines 142-147 should set the repo to > >> the desired revision. > > > > > > This does sound like the best bet, to me. > > -- > > Christopher Larson > > Hi all, > > Just wanted to touch base on this issue. I didn't hear anything back > on the little patch I posted...not sure if that's a silent rejection, > if I didn't include the right info in the subject line, or if folks > haven't had a chance to test it. If there's something I screwed up, > please do let me know for future reference. :) > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2012-December/003962.html Sorry about the delay, vacation and lots of other distractions. The patch was find and I've merged it now, thanks. I did have trouble applying it as it appeared the whitespace was messed up. I fixed it up manually this time though. Cheers, Richard