From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2] pktgen: support net namespace
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:02:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359428563.20729.12.camel@cr0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874ni0k965.fsf@xmission.com>
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 18:36 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> >
> > v2: remove a useless check
> >
> > This patch add net namespace to pktgen, so that
> > we can use pktgen in different namespaces.
> >
> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> > net/core/pktgen.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> Skiming through this again I have spotted what looks like a pretty
> major bug. You are limiting yourself to one network device per network
> namespace when the actual limit is one network device per thread.
>
> I think you can just kill the dev member of pktgen_net and the two or
> three lines of code that touch it.
Good point!
It is used by pktgen_device_event() to check if the device generates the
event is the one in our namespace.
It is safe to continue the search even if it is not in our namespace,
but it is not efficient. Probably we need to make pktgen_threads list
per-namespace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 1:53 [Patch net-next v2] pktgen: support net namespace Cong Wang
2013-01-29 2:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-29 3:02 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2013-01-29 3:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-29 3:54 ` Cong Wang
2013-01-29 4:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359428563.20729.12.camel@cr0 \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.