All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:09:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359752988.22968.16.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANK3SE25kcgSu2dwKtQKU6-wvryC4qNQJu_nj3NPJHQTTC0oXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 19:13 +0000, Mark Einon wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 15:04, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Mark Einon wrote:
> >
> >> >> > >> This patch fixes the kernel warning generated when putting an MSI MS-1727
> >> >> > >> GT740 laptop into suspend mode. The call sequence in this case calls
> >> >> > >> free_irq() twice, once in pci_remove() and once then in pci_suspend().
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > You mean /first/ in pci_suspend() and /then/ in pci_remove() on the
> >> >> > > already suspended devices, right?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, I did. The call sequence is suspend then resume. My bad.
> >> >
> >> > Why does the pci_suspend routine call free_irq() at all?  As far as I
> >> > know, it's not supposed to do that.  Won't the device continue to use
> >> > the same IRQ after it is resumed?
> >>
> >> This sounds reasonable to me - I think we could probably get rid of
> >> the request_irq() call from resume, and use
> >> disable_irq()/enable_irq()?
> >
> > Why mess around with IRQ settings at all?  Just have the suspend
> > routine tell the controller to stop generating them.
> >
> > Alan Stern
> >
> 
> I looked into doing this; using context_stop() to stop the controller running.
> 
> However, removing the enable_irq() from pci_resume() involves not
> calling ohci_enable() (as it is also the fw_card_driver.enable
> function, and can't easily be modified). As this call involves a lot
> of register writes and I have no devices to test, I decided against
> it.
> 
> I'll send an updated patch for consideration that merely uses a bool
> to stop the irq being freed twice - crude, but it works without
> changing too much code.

Hi Mark,

I think what Alan means is that the suspend/resume code should just
mask/unmask interrupts at the OHCI controller, via the OHCI
IntEventClear/Set registers (naturally, saving the current mask and
restoring it on resume).

Of course, there's a lot more to do with an OHCI controller -- as you
note. Like stopping running DMA contexts :)  And restarting them on
resume.

I'd do it, but I'm buried to my eyeballs in tty right now -- not fun. I
can _eventually_ do this as I need to address problems with the FW643
anyway at some point, but it's going to be a little while.

In the meantime, I'm a little confused: you say you can't test this code
because you have no hardware; but then how'd you trip this bug?

Regards,
Peter Hurley

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28 22:09 [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning Mark Einon
2013-01-28 23:01 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-29 12:44   ` Mark Einon
2013-01-29 16:04     ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-29 17:01       ` Alan Stern
2013-01-29 17:01         ` Alan Stern
2013-01-30 23:45         ` Mark Einon
2013-01-31 15:04           ` Alan Stern
2013-01-31 15:04             ` Alan Stern
2013-02-01 19:13             ` Mark Einon
2013-02-01 21:09               ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-02-01 21:14                 ` Peter Hurley
2013-02-01 23:00                 ` Mark Einon
2013-02-02 15:01                   ` Stefan Richter
2013-02-02 15:16                     ` Alan Stern
2013-02-02 15:16                       ` Alan Stern
2013-02-02 15:30                       ` Stefan Richter
2013-02-02 15:30                         ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-30 23:43       ` Mark Einon
2013-02-02 14:24         ` Stefan Richter
2013-02-02 15:21           ` Alan Stern
2013-02-02 15:21             ` Alan Stern
2013-01-29  2:15 ` Greg KH
2013-02-01 19:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Mark Einon
2013-02-01 19:50   ` Mark Einon
2013-02-05 10:58   ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Einon
2013-02-05 10:58     ` Mark Einon
2013-02-17  8:41     ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359752988.22968.16.camel@thor.lan \
    --to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mark.einon@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.