From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:08:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360094930.3859.90.camel@falcor1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130205180300.GE2335@fenchurch.internal.datastacks.com>
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be
> better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol
> with a structure like:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/30/68 was in response to the assumption
that the initramfs is measured/appraised. These patches attempt to
address those concerns.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 12:34 [RFC 0/2] initramfs with digital signature protection Dmitry Kasatkin
2013-02-05 12:34 ` [RFC 1/2] export unpack_to_rootfs Dmitry Kasatkin
2013-02-05 16:48 ` Peter Jones
2013-02-05 17:16 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-08 8:30 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-05 12:34 ` [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection Dmitry Kasatkin
2013-02-05 18:03 ` Peter Jones
2013-02-05 20:08 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2013-02-05 22:03 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-05 18:19 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-05 18:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-02-05 18:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-05 21:55 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-04-05 13:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-08 19:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-04-08 20:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-08 20:17 ` Josh Boyer
2013-04-09 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-10 3:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-04-10 19:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-10 21:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-04-11 8:08 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2013-04-11 14:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-12 11:54 ` Mimi Zohar
[not found] ` <CACE9dm-GZpjco8u6jNxLQpYA8LYSeoVjsyyRXVwxXHzjO-LvGw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-11 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-11 18:42 ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2013-04-11 21:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-12 12:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-05 20:36 ` Peter Jones
2013-02-05 22:09 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-06 5:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-06 8:01 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-06 16:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 9:16 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-08 15:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 16:24 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-08 16:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-07 17:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-08 8:34 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-08 13:27 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-11 21:59 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360094930.3859.90.camel@falcor1 \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.