From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] x86, head_32: Some cleanups, -v2
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:52:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360439574-16122-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Ok,
here's the next version with new_cpu_data left put and two minor fixlets
added at the end. The patchset was boot-tested on a bunch of baremetal
boxes and all QEMU cpu models - no issues.
Boot tests:
* baremetal:
- P4
- Atom n270
- 32-bit kernel on an AMD64 (F10h Phenom and Intel SNB)
* qemu, with cpu models:
- qemu64
- phenom
- core2duo
- kvm64
- qemu32
- kvm32
- coreduo
- 486{,SX}
- pentium{,2,3}
- athlon
- n270,+movbe
- Conroe
- Penryn
- Nehalem
- Westmere
- SandyBridge
- Haswell
- Opteron_G{1,2,3,4,5}
Why am I testing all those, you ask? Because I'm a sadistic mofo :-)
Changelog:
v1:
here are some initial low-hanging fruits wrt head_32.S cleanup. I've
made them as easily digestible as possible; after all, this is boot asm
and meddling with it tends to upset kernels.
Also, I've made the assumption that having boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level
contain the CPUID level for the boot cpu means that the APs have the
same CPUID level. This should be the case on X86.
They boot fine 486 and 486SX in qemu but I'd like to hear whether
the direction I'm going is ok before I continue testing them on real
hardware.
Borislav Petkov (5):
x86, head_32: Remove i386 pieces
x86: Detect CPUID support early at boot
x86, head_32: Remove second CPUID detection from default_entry
x86, head_32: Give the 6 label a real name
x86, head_32: Remove an old gcc2 fix
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S | 92 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.3.535.ga923c31
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-09 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-09 19:52 Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-02-09 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86, head_32: Remove i386 pieces Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Detect CPUID support early at boot Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86, head_32: Remove second CPUID detection from default_entry Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, head_32: Give the 6 label a real name Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 19:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, head_32: Remove an old gcc2 fix Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-09 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-09 21:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 22:08 ` [PATCH 5/5 -v2] x86, head_32: Clear DF much earlier Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, head_32: Remove an old gcc2 fix H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-09 23:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/5 -v2.1] x86: Detect CPUID support early at boot Borislav Petkov
2013-02-10 4:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-10 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-10 15:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360439574-16122-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.