From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com,
p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com,
fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it,
juri.lelli@gmail.com, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it,
insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com,
jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] rtmutex: turn the plist into an rb-tree.
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:50:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360608656-7969-10-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360608656-7969-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Turn the pi-chains from plist to rb-tree, in the rt_mutex code,
and provide a proper comparison function for -deadline and
-priority tasks.
This is done mainly because:
- classical prio field of the plist is just an int, which might
not be enough for representing a deadline;
- manipulating such a list would become O(nr_deadline_tasks),
which might be to much, as the number of -deadline task increases.
Therefore, an rb-tree is used, and tasks are queued in it according
to the following logic:
- among two -priority (i.e., SCHED_BATCH/OTHER/RR/FIFO) tasks, the
one with the higher (lower, actually!) prio wins;
- among a -priority and a -deadline task, the latter always wins;
- among two -deadline tasks, the one with the earliest deadline
wins.
Queueing and dequeueing functions are changed accordingly, for both
the list of a task's pi-waiters and the list of tasks blocked on
a pi-lock.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/init_task.h | 10 +++
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 18 ++----
include/linux/sched.h | 4 +-
kernel/fork.c | 3 +-
kernel/futex.c | 2 +
kernel/rtmutex-debug.c | 8 +--
kernel/rtmutex.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 22 +++----
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 --
9 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index 6d087c5..7d2634b 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
#include <linux/user_namespace.h>
#include <linux/securebits.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -143,6 +144,14 @@ extern struct task_group root_task_group;
#define INIT_TASK_COMM "swapper"
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
+# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk) \
+ .pi_waiters = RB_ROOT, \
+ .pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL,
+#else
+# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk)
+#endif
+
/*
* INIT_TASK is used to set up the first task table, touch at
* your own risk!. Base=0, limit=0x1fffff (=2MB)
@@ -210,6 +219,7 @@ extern struct task_group root_task_group;
INIT_TRACE_RECURSION \
INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk) \
INIT_CPUSET_SEQ \
+ INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk) \
}
diff --git a/include/linux/rtmutex.h b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
index de17134..3aed8d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#define __LINUX_RT_MUTEX_H
#include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <linux/plist.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl */
@@ -22,12 +22,14 @@ extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl */
* The rt_mutex structure
*
* @wait_lock: spinlock to protect the structure
- * @wait_list: pilist head to enqueue waiters in priority order
+ * @waiters: rbtree root to enqueue waiters in priority order
+ * @waiters_leftmost: top waiter
* @owner: the mutex owner
*/
struct rt_mutex {
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
- struct plist_head wait_list;
+ struct rb_root waiters;
+ struct rb_node *waiters_leftmost;
struct task_struct *owner;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
int save_state;
@@ -66,7 +68,7 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper;
#define __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
{ .wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mutexname.wait_lock) \
- , .wait_list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(mutexname.wait_list) \
+ , .waiters = RB_ROOT \
, .owner = NULL \
__DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)}
@@ -98,12 +100,4 @@ extern int rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
extern void rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk) \
- .pi_waiters = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.pi_waiters), \
- INIT_RT_MUTEX_DEBUG(tsk)
-#else
-# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk)
-#endif
-
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index d4f8f9e..132db70 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct sched_param {
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/timex.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
+#include <linux/plist.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/thread_info.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
@@ -1548,7 +1549,8 @@ struct task_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
/* PI waiters blocked on a rt_mutex held by this task */
- struct plist_head pi_waiters;
+ struct rb_root pi_waiters;
+ struct rb_node *pi_waiters_leftmost;
/* Deadlock detection and priority inheritance handling */
struct rt_mutex_waiter *pi_blocked_on;
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index e84562d..4d31e6a 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,8 @@ static void rt_mutex_init_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
raw_spin_lock_init(&p->pi_lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
- plist_head_init(&p->pi_waiters);
+ p->pi_waiters = RB_ROOT;
+ p->pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL;
p->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
#endif
}
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 19eb089..16ea62d 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2312,6 +2312,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* code while we sleep on uaddr.
*/
debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rt_waiter.pi_tree_entry);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rt_waiter.tree_entry);
rt_waiter.task = NULL;
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key2, VERIFY_WRITE);
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c b/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
index 16502d3..41c18f5 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/plist.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void printk_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int print_owner)
void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
{
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_head_empty(&task->pi_waiters));
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters));
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
}
@@ -153,16 +153,12 @@ void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
void debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
memset(waiter, 0x11, sizeof(*waiter));
- plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, MAX_PRIO);
- plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, MAX_PRIO);
waiter->deadlock_task_pid = NULL;
}
void debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
put_pid(waiter->deadlock_task_pid);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->list_entry));
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->pi_list_entry));
memset(waiter, 0x22, sizeof(*waiter));
}
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index a242e69..227deb4 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -90,10 +90,104 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
}
#endif
+static inline int
+rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
+{
+ if (left->task->prio < right->task->prio)
+ return 1;
+
+ /*
+ * If both tasks are dl_task(), we check their deadlines.
+ */
+ if (dl_prio(left->task->prio) && dl_prio(right->task->prio))
+ return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
+ int leftmost = 1;
+
+ while (*link) {
+ parent = *link;
+ entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
+ if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
+ link = &parent->rb_left;
+ } else {
+ link = &parent->rb_right;
+ leftmost = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (leftmost)
+ lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry;
+
+ rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link);
+ rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry))
+ return;
+
+ if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry)
+ lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry);
+
+ rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+ struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
+ int leftmost = 1;
+
+ while (*link) {
+ parent = *link;
+ entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
+ if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
+ link = &parent->rb_left;
+ } else {
+ link = &parent->rb_right;
+ leftmost = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (leftmost)
+ task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry;
+
+ rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link);
+ rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+ if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry))
+ return;
+
+ if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry)
+ task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+
+ rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+}
+
/*
- * Calculate task priority from the waiter list priority
+ * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority
*
- * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter list is empty or when
+ * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when
* the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting
*/
int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
@@ -101,7 +195,7 @@ int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
return task->normal_prio;
- return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->pi_list_entry.prio,
+ return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio,
task->normal_prio);
}
@@ -219,7 +313,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
* priority adjustment is necessary.
*/
- if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio)
+ if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->task->prio == task->prio)
goto out_unlock_pi;
lock = waiter->lock;
@@ -240,9 +334,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
/* Requeue the waiter */
- plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
- waiter->list_entry.prio = task->prio;
- plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
+ waiter->task->prio = task->prio;
+ rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
/* Release the task */
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -266,17 +360,15 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
/* Boost the owner */
- plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
- waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio;
- plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
} else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
/* Deboost the owner */
- plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio;
- plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
}
@@ -341,7 +433,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
* 3) it is top waiter
*/
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
- if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->list_entry.prio) {
+ if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task->prio) {
if (!waiter || waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
return 0;
}
@@ -355,7 +447,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
/* remove the queued waiter. */
if (waiter) {
- plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
}
@@ -365,8 +457,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
*/
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
top = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- top->pi_list_entry.prio = top->list_entry.prio;
- plist_add(&top->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, top);
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
}
@@ -402,13 +493,11 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
waiter->task = task;
waiter->lock = lock;
- plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, task->prio);
- plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, task->prio);
-
+
/* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
task->pi_blocked_on = waiter;
@@ -419,8 +508,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
- plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
- plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
@@ -472,7 +561,7 @@ static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
* boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing
* lock->wait_lock.
*/
- plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, ¤t->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
@@ -496,7 +585,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
int chain_walk = 0;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
- plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -507,13 +596,13 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
- plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter);
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
struct rt_mutex_waiter *next;
next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
- plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+ rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, next);
}
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
@@ -523,8 +612,6 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
}
- WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->pi_list_entry));
-
if (!chain_walk)
return;
@@ -551,7 +638,7 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
- if (!waiter || waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) {
+ if (!waiter || waiter->task->prio == task->prio) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return;
}
@@ -624,6 +711,8 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
int ret = 0;
debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry);
+ RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -890,7 +979,8 @@ void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name)
{
lock->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
- plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list);
+ lock->waiters = RB_ROOT;
+ lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL;
debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
index 53a66c8..b65442f 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ extern void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *lock);
* This is the control structure for tasks blocked on a rt_mutex,
* which is allocated on the kernel stack on of the blocked task.
*
- * @list_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters list
- * @pi_list_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters list
+ * @tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree
+ * @pi_tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree
* @task: task reference to the blocked task
*/
struct rt_mutex_waiter {
- struct plist_node list_entry;
- struct plist_node pi_list_entry;
+ struct rb_node tree_entry;
+ struct rb_node pi_tree_entry;
struct task_struct *task;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
@@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
};
/*
- * Various helpers to access the waiters-plist:
+ * Various helpers to access the waiters-tree:
*/
static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
- return !plist_head_empty(&lock->wait_list);
+ return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters);
}
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w;
- w = plist_first_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
- list_entry);
+ w = rb_entry(lock->waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+ tree_entry);
BUG_ON(w->lock != lock);
return w;
@@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return !plist_head_empty(&p->pi_waiters);
+ return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters);
}
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return plist_first_entry(&p->pi_waiters, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
- pi_list_entry);
+ return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+ pi_tree_entry);
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 17a60e4..92f962d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7163,10 +7163,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&init_task.preempt_notifiers);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
- plist_head_init(&init_task.pi_waiters);
-#endif
-
/*
* The boot idle thread does lazy MMU switching as well:
*/
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-11 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 18:50 [PATCH 00/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v7 Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 01/14] sched: add sched_class->task_dead Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 02/14] sched: add extended scheduling interface Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 03/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE structures & implementation Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 04/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE SMP-related data structures & logic Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 05/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE avg_update accounting Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 06/14] sched: add period support for -deadline tasks Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 07/14] sched: add schedstats " Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 08/14] sched: add latency tracing " Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 10/14] sched: drafted deadline inheritance logic Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 11/14] sched: add bandwidth management for sched_dl Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 12/14] sched: make dl_bw a sub-quota of rt_bw Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 13/14] sched: speed up -dl pushes with a push-heap Juri Lelli
2013-02-11 18:50 ` [PATCH 14/14] sched: add sched_dl documentation Juri Lelli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-14 10:43 [PATCH 00/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v8 Juri Lelli
2013-10-14 10:43 ` [PATCH 09/14] rtmutex: turn the plist into an rb-tree Juri Lelli
2013-11-07 13:43 [PATCH 00/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v9 Juri Lelli
2013-11-07 13:43 ` [PATCH 09/14] rtmutex: turn the plist into an rb-tree Juri Lelli
2013-11-21 3:07 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360608656-7969-10-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--to=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
--cc=insop.song@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=liming.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.