All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:31:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362065465.1758.15.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362046013.4460.195.camel@marge.simpson.net>

2013-02-28 (목), 11:06 +0100, Mike Galbraith:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> > Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship.  Looks like
> > just for benchmarks.  Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get
> > a benefit from this?  I don't know ;-)
> 
> ??  Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you
> describe one connection and have it remain meaningful?  I love "her" is
> unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist.

Maybe I misunderstood something.  I was thinking about typical
cooperation models like manager-worker, producer-consumer or pipeline
and thought that they are usually one-way relationship in terms of the
wakeup.

Thanks,
Namhyung



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-28 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-28  6:38 [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy Michael Wang
2013-02-28  7:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  7:40   ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  7:42     ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  8:06       ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:04     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:14       ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  8:24         ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:49           ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  9:18             ` Mike Galbraith
2013-03-01  2:18               ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  9:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-02-28 10:06   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28 15:31     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-03-01  2:30       ` Michael Wang
2013-03-01  2:18   ` Michael Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362065465.1758.15.camel@leonhard \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.