From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UH9yY-0008GQ-Sv for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:34:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r2H9Q1Nu012119; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:26:01 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Tut-fElFoqHv; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:26:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r2H9PpQT012112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:25:54 GMT Message-ID: <1363511802.6710.16.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:16:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1363377280-14797-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] util-linux: Update License Information (remove GPLv3 Licnese) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:34:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 22:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > > The upstream authors have updated the licenses of a couple subcomponents, > > these were GPLv3, but updated to be either GPLv2 or LGPLv2.1 accordingly. > > These changes make the util-linux package become completely non-GPLv3. > > Is it possible to demote license from V3 to V2 like that I wonder The maintainer sought out approval from the copyright holders so yes. The more people who've changed the files in question, the harder it becomes. Cheers, Richard