From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:43965 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151Ab3CTVzw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:55:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1363816548.9284.11.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130320_225556_035281_FDD944CF) Subject: Re: rcutree tree warning during P2P device support testing From: Johannes Berg To: Arend van Spriel Cc: David Spinadel , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, hostap@lists.shmoo.com Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:55:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <514A2E47.7080108@broadcom.com> References: <5149CD81.40301@broadcom.com> <1363792139.8224.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <514A274F.5030303@broadcom.com> <1363814947.9284.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <514A2E47.7080108@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 22:46 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > It looks like some rcu head list corruption ... no idea really. > > > > I have now (I think). I did a kfree of the driver's vif structure, which > is container of the wireless_dev and that is still on the rcu head list. I don't really see why that would be the case though, there's no call_rcu() or kfree_rcu(), is there? johannes