From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIp4Y-0005G2-Uy for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:39:11 +0100 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r2LNVW7i011241; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:31:32 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id m4xNhmG1uOn7; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:31:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r2LNVNET011233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:31:26 GMT Message-ID: <1363908112.16482.151.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:21:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: <13d8f28b861.2760.0f39ed3bcad52ef2c88c90062b7714dc@gmail.com> References: <1363881315-24352-1-git-send-email-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> <1363881315-24352-15-git-send-email-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> <13d8f28b861.2760.0f39ed3bcad52ef2c88c90062b7714dc@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] distro: Add separatebuilddir.inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:39:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 23:54 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 21 March 2013 16:55:14 Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Going forward its going to be useful to separate build data from source data > > in those autotooled projects which support it. Unfortunately there is a lot > > of breakage so for now, this starts the creation of an opt in list which > > we can iterate over enable more recipes over time. > > > This does not yet seem to cover the 'O=' family, right? Correct. autotools seemed like the best place to start with that and the trick I mention above with the configure checksum change is only currently enabled there anyway. We could extend this to other places if it makes sense although I'm not sure how many O= recipes we have... Cheers, Richard