From: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@eitzenberger.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] NFQUEUE: add --queue-cpu-fanout parameter
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:53:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364075629.4349.11.camel@tiger2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130323195256.GN13505@imap.eitzenberger.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 20:52 +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> > If possible, it could be interesting to be able to setup the balance
> > parameter by using an option in the same way fail-open option:
> > uint32_t flags = NFQA_CFG_F_FAIL_OPEN;
> > uint32_t mask = NFQA_CFG_F_FAIL_OPEN;
> > int r = nfq_set_queue_flags(qh, mask, flags);
> > This way, it is possible to tune the system without changing the
> > ruleset.
>
> Not sure how the FAIL_OPEN relates to the CPU fanout. Do you want to
> setup the CPU fanout (on, off) per queue?
You are right on a major point. FAIL_OPEN is definitely per-queue and
CPU fanout is related to a fanout group. So we will have to have the
whole mechanism bind to a queue, warn the kernel that it is in a fanout
group...
That could be interesting as we will be able to tune the setting from
the application but this seems to be a lot of work too. And I don't see
any functional benefit omit this tuning from the application.
So, if you don't find any other one, forgot my request for now :)
BR,
--
Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
Blog: https://home.regit.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-23 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 14:14 [PATCH RFC 0/3] NFQUEUE: introduce CPU fanout holger
2013-03-19 14:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] " holger
2013-03-19 14:26 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 14:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2013-03-19 14:37 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 21:38 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-19 21:34 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-19 21:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2013-03-19 22:30 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-19 19:56 ` Florian Westphal
2013-03-19 20:17 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-19 14:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] NFQUEUE: coalesce IPv4 and IPv6 hashing holger
2013-03-19 14:27 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 14:39 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-19 14:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] NFQUEUE: add --queue-cpu-fanout parameter holger
2013-03-19 14:34 ` Eric Leblond
2013-03-19 16:07 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-23 19:52 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2013-03-23 21:53 ` Eric Leblond [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364075629.4349.11.camel@tiger2 \
--to=eric@regit.org \
--cc=holger@eitzenberger.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.