From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ohering@suse.com,
jbottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com
Subject: scanning for LUNs
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:12:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365088357-22624-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> (raw)
Here is the code snippet for scanning LUNS (drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c in function
__scsi_scan_target()):
/*
* Scan LUN 0, if there is some response, scan further. Ideally, we
* would not configure LUN 0 until all LUNs are scanned.
*/
res = scsi_probe_and_add_lun(starget, 0, &bflags, NULL, rescan, NULL);
if (res == SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT || res == SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT) {
if (scsi_report_lun_scan(starget, bflags, rescan) != 0)
So, if we don't get a response while scanning LUN0, we will not use scsi_report_lun_scan().
On Hyper-V, the scsi emulation on the host does not treat LUN0 as anything special and we
could have situations where the only device under a scsi controller is at a location other than 0
or 1. In this case the standard LUN scanning code in Linux fails to detect this device. Is this
behaviour expected? Why is LUN0 treated differently here. Looking at the scsi spec, I am not sure
if this is what is specified. Any help/guidance will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
K. Y
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 15:12 K. Y. Srinivasan [this message]
2013-04-04 15:15 ` scanning for LUNs James Bottomley
2013-04-04 17:12 ` KY Srinivasan
2013-04-08 14:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-08 14:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-08 17:34 ` KY Srinivasan
2013-04-08 17:34 ` KY Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365088357-22624-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com \
--to=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohering@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.