All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1365114959.14772.18@snotra>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d30a68d..a511cb5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ On 04/04/2013 05:30:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
 > 
 > > On 04/04/2013 07:54:20 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
 > >> On 03.04.2013, at 03:57, Scott Wood wrote:
-> >> > +    if (opp->mpic_mode_mask = GCR_MODE_PROXY)
+> >> > +    if (opp->mpic_mode_mask == GCR_MODE_PROXY)
 > >> Shouldn't this be an &?
 > >
 > > The way the mode field was originally documented was a two-bit  
 > field, where 0b11 was external proxy, and 0b10 was reserved.  If we  
 > use & it would have to be:
 > >
-> >    if ((opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY) = GCR_MODE_PROXY)
+> >    if ((opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY) == GCR_MODE_PROXY)
 > >        ...
 > >
 > > Simply testing "opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY" would return  
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ On 04/04/2013 05:30:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
 > Ok, please add a comment about this here then :).
 
 What sort of comment would you like?  Or do you want me to use the "(x  
-& y) = y" version?
+& y) == y" version?
 
 > >> > @@ -460,6 +464,13 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu  
 > *vcpu)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d3aeb6b..29f645f 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\02C5A4219-A912-4909-AE8E-63B8309AD27F@suse.de\0"
  "From\0Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH v3 6/6] kvm/ppc/mpic: add KVM_CAP_IRQ_MPIC\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:35:59 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 4 Apr 2013 17:35:59 -0500\0"
  "To\0Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>\0"
  "Cc\0<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org> <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>"
   <kvm@vger.kernel.org> <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@
  "> \n"
  "> > On 04/04/2013 07:54:20 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:\n"
  "> >> On 03.04.2013, at 03:57, Scott Wood wrote:\n"
- "> >> > +    if (opp->mpic_mode_mask = GCR_MODE_PROXY)\n"
+ "> >> > +    if (opp->mpic_mode_mask == GCR_MODE_PROXY)\n"
  "> >> Shouldn't this be an &?\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > The way the mode field was originally documented was a two-bit  \n"
  "> field, where 0b11 was external proxy, and 0b10 was reserved.  If we  \n"
  "> use & it would have to be:\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> >    if ((opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY) = GCR_MODE_PROXY)\n"
+ "> >    if ((opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY) == GCR_MODE_PROXY)\n"
  "> >        ...\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > Simply testing \"opp->mpic_mode_mask & GCR_MODE_PROXY\" would return  \n"
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
  "> Ok, please add a comment about this here then :).\n"
  "\n"
  "What sort of comment would you like?  Or do you want me to use the \"(x  \n"
- "& y) = y\" version?\n"
+ "& y) == y\" version?\n"
  "\n"
  "> >> > @@ -460,6 +464,13 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu  \n"
  "> *vcpu)\n"
@@ -65,4 +65,4 @@
  "\n"
  -Scott
 
-2176f1db15e7072137aa7933dc758bb133886f74ad2771835492544a896b381b
+7623dad2cf1cfff26407394b7e12fc40f242d07bba6a62818ea186ee04f2f535

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.