From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: VCPU migration overhead conpensation ?
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 03:46:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1365472000.9958.110.camel@Solace>
References: <CAPqOm-pCJXGzX9ebkxy16oTp9P-Rk=41mgZywznWOm5VEn3XBw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5905612552194460705=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPqOm-pCJXGzX9ebkxy16oTp9P-Rk=41mgZywznWOm5VEn3XBw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============5905612552194460705==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Y99Yx/xVp+nUgB7dJi73"

--=-Y99Yx/xVp+nUgB7dJi73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On ven, 2013-03-29 at 16:16 -0500, Sisu Xi wrote:
> Hi, all:
>=20
Hi again Sisu,

> I am studying the credit2 scheduler and found it would compensate VCPU
> migration with 50 microseconds.
> /* How much to "compensate" a vcpu for L2 migration */
> #define CSCHED_MIGRATE_COMPENSATION MICROSECS(50)
>=20
>=20
> Why 50us? Is this number based on some experiments?=20
>
This predates my joining of the Xen community, but yes, ISTR hearing
people talking about it coming from a mixture of common sense and
experience/measurements.

BTW, you may want to try, when sending e-mail to this list, adding in Cc
some of the people that are more involved with the code/feature you're
asking about. You can look at the MAINTAINERS file, in the source tree,
to have an idea of who to put there. For instance, for scheduling, the
absolute authority is George (which I added), and in fact MAINTAINERS
says:=20

SCHEDULING
M:      George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
S:      Supported
F:      xen/common/sched*

(however, feel free to Cc me as well... I do not master all the Xen
scheduler code yet, but am always curious about it. :-) )

Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-Y99Yx/xVp+nUgB7dJi73
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlFjcwAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTi0ACfYjdaxYk93OPpBYmSc2nboU4e
tBUAoJe9n5MF16rNkduJfx+hSgFkiDEQ
=LCId
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Y99Yx/xVp+nUgB7dJi73--


--===============5905612552194460705==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============5905612552194460705==--