From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UPY2b-0004LT-Tc for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:52:50 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r39CkTpA012318; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:46:29 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id K2caPgdMnJTZ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:46:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r39CkKjW012311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1365510909.12407.79.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Radu Moisan Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:35:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1365438555-19397-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> References: <1365438555-19397-1-git-send-email-radu.moisan@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udev: Move udevd back to /sbin X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:52:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 19:29 +0300, Radu Moisan wrote: > Along with v182 upgrade udevd was moved to ${base_libdir} > making scripts like init-live.sh to fail in finding udevd > > Fixes [Yocto #4046] > > Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan > --- > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc | 3 ++- > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_182.bb | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) We needed a decision on this. I've rewritten the commit message and merged it. Most of the feedback was about the commit message, not the patch itself. There were also no better proposals for how we could actually fix the bugs we were seeing. Cheers, Richard