From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitbake.conf: include machine name in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:44:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365579840.12407.123.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365578806-1907-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 09:26 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> This allows a clean seperation between all image outputs and making it
> possible to have convinience symlinks to make it ready to deploy. And
> while it isn't a valid reason, it must be mentioned: BSP layers which
> do use convenience symlinks already don't step on files owned by
> others anymore.
>
> I assumed this was the default behaviour in OE-classic, but as it
> turns out every DISTRO set it to deploy/images/$MACHINE on its own.
>
> Code inspections shows that the all references to the image deploy dir
> in classes and scripts in OE-core do the right thing and parse the
> DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> ---
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm pretty sure someone proposed something like this (relocating output)
just before danny. Changing something like this just before release is a
*really* bad idea. It breaks the docs and the assumptions the
autobuilder and several scripts (e.g. runqemu and the qemuimage testing)
make about where output ends up.
So as I said last time, if we want to do something like this, lets do it
at the start of development of a release, not the end.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 7:26 [RFC][PATCH] bitbake.conf: include machine name in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE Koen Kooi
2013-04-10 7:44 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-04-10 8:05 ` Koen Kooi
2013-04-10 8:29 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365579840.12407.123.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.