From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] perf, amd: Support for Family 16h L2I Performance Counters
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:49:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365594552.30071.63.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBRTaMV9FNmX6qRJAHaO8yTyiqF=EzmeC7Gp7=e-7Bo-gA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 13:38 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 10:23 -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> > > Upcoming AMD Family 16h Processors provide 4 new performance counters
> > > to count L2 related events. Similar to northbridge counters, these new
> > > counters are shared across multiple CPUs that share the same L2 cache.
> > > This patchset adds support for these new counters and enforces sharing
> > > by leveraging the existing sharing logic used for the northbridge
> > > counters.
> >
> > If they're separate counters -- not shared with the regular cpu
> > counters like the 10h NB counters are, then they should have their own
> > PMU driver.
> >
> > Similar to the 15h NB counters; which are a separate set of counters
> > and no longer overlay the normal counters.
> >
> Well, that's how this was suggested but that's not how it's
> implemented currently
> and committed if I recall.
Hmm.. the 15h old interface bits got merged? I thought I kept telling
that should be done like the intel uncore stuff since the hardware
interface wasn't retarded anymore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 15:23 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] perf, amd: Support for Family 16h L2I Performance Counters Jacob Shin
2013-04-09 15:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] perf, amd: Further generalize NB event constraints handling logic Jacob Shin
2013-04-09 15:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] perf, x86: Allow for multiple kfree_on_online pointers Jacob Shin
2013-04-09 15:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] perf, amd: Enable L2I performance counters on AMD Family 16h Jacob Shin
2013-04-10 9:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/3] perf, amd: Support for Family 16h L2I Performance Counters Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 11:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-10 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-10 11:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-10 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-10 12:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-10 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-10 12:29 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-10 15:03 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-10 12:29 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365594552.30071.63.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.