From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:32890 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934822Ab3DJUAP (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:00:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1365624006.4235.42.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130410_220019_092094_5142A3F0) Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] backports: add blacklist module support From: Johannes Berg To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:00:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20130410_215802_673573_F59A500A) References: <1365593728-5720-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1365593728-5720-14-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1365600903.4235.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130410_215802_673573_F59A500A) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 12:57 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > So you do mean "# new-driver old-driver", but then shouldn't the iwlwifi > > lines be reversed? > > You would know better, sorry I thought iwlagn replaces those, I'll swap. Well it's a bit complicated and it changed a few times, but now there's only iwlegacy and iwlwifi (with iwldvm/iwlmvm), so iwlagn no longer exists. It did inbetween at some point, and I think iwlwifi even existed before already, but that doesn't really matter since a new iwlwifi would override an existing iwlwifi. So yeah I think they should be switched. johannes