From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: Convert to use regulator_map_voltage_ascend
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:30:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366425017.8200.1.camel@phoenix> (raw)
All regulators have ascendant voltage list in this driver.
Some regulators have more than 200 supported voltages.
e.g.
For TPS65910_REG_VDD1 and TPS65910_REG_VDD2:
n_voltages = VDD1_2_NUM_VOLT_FINE * VDD1_2_NUM_VOLT_COARSE
= 73 * 3
= 219
Thus it worth converting to regulator_map_voltage_ascend rather than use
default regulator_map_voltage_iterate.
For consistent, convert all regulators to regulator_map_voltage_ascend.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
index 6ba6931..45c1644 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65910_ops_dcdc = {
.set_voltage_sel = tps65910_set_voltage_dcdc_sel,
.set_voltage_time_sel = regulator_set_voltage_time_sel,
.list_voltage = tps65910_list_voltage_dcdc,
+ .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65910_ops_vdd3 = {
@@ -758,6 +759,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65910_ops_vdd3 = {
.get_mode = tps65910_get_mode,
.get_voltage = tps65910_get_voltage_vdd3,
.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
+ .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65910_ops = {
@@ -769,6 +771,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65910_ops = {
.get_voltage_sel = tps65910_get_voltage_sel,
.set_voltage_sel = tps65910_set_voltage_sel,
.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
+ .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
};
static struct regulator_ops tps65911_ops = {
@@ -780,6 +783,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65911_ops = {
.get_voltage_sel = tps65911_get_voltage_sel,
.set_voltage_sel = tps65911_set_voltage_sel,
.list_voltage = tps65911_list_voltage,
+ .map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
};
static int tps65910_set_ext_sleep_config(struct tps65910_reg *pmic,
--
1.7.10.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-20 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-20 2:30 Axel Lin [this message]
2013-04-23 10:41 ` [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: Convert to use regulator_map_voltage_ascend Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366425017.8200.1.camel@phoenix \
--to=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=anilkumar@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.