From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UTSgG-0005mT-46 for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:57:58 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r3K7eqNj031877; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:40:52 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2I9T36MIQxE8; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:40:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r3K7ekvd031867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:40:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1366443597.10502.140.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Purcareata Bogdan-B43198 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:39:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: bitbake clean / cleanall / cleansstate not working X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 07:58:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 09:42 +0000, Purcareata Bogdan-B43198 wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Yocto with BB_VERSION = "1.18.0" and the commands in the subject do not seem to work - they don't do anything. The image has the packages built. > > $ bitbake -c cleanall gcc > [ ... ] > NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 3 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded. > > $ bitbake -c clean gcc > [ ... ] > NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 1 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded. > > $ bitbake -c cleansstate gcc > [ ... ] > NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded. > > The information in [ ... ] is not really relevant. I just wanted to > give the output message. I know the error description is vague, but so > is this behavior. I don't know what it could be further related to. What exactly are you trying to clean? The above messages say it ran 1, 2 or 3 tasks and they all succeeded. Keep in mind there are several "gcc" components such as gcc-cross, gcc-cross-initial and so on. "gcc" is the one used on target. Cheers, Richard