All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:29:48 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009135656.GD7561@rei.lan>



----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > +static void work_push_retry(int worker, const char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	int i, ret, worker_min, worker_max;
> > +
> > +	if (worker < 0) {
> > +		/* pick any, try -worker first */
> > +		worker_min = worker * (-1);
> > +		worker_max = worker_count;
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* keep trying worker */
> > +		worker_min = worker;
> > +		worker_max = worker + 1;
> > +	}
> > +	i = worker_min;
> > +
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		ret = queue_push(workers[i].q, buf);
> > +		if (ret == 1)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		if (++i >= worker_max) {
> > +			i = worker_min;
> > +			usleep(100000);
> 
> 
> My only concern is that we sleep for too long here. Maybe we should
> start with smaller sleep here and increase it after a while.
> 
> Or have you checked that the tests runs as fast as if we had smaller
> sleep here?

Small benchmark shows that smaller sleep can complete faster. I'll send v2.

> 
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void stop_workers(void)
> >  {
> >  	const char stop_code[1] = { '\0' };
> > @@ -292,7 +319,7 @@ static void stop_workers(void)
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> >  		if (workers[i].q)
> > -			TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[i].q, stop_code), 1);
> > +			work_push_retry(i, stop_code);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < worker_count; i++) {
> > @@ -310,7 +337,7 @@ static void rep_sched_work(const char *path, int rep)
> >  	for (i = j = 0; i < rep; i++, j++) {
> >  		if (j >= worker_count)
> >  			j = 0;
> > -		TST_RETRY_FUNC(queue_push(workers[j].q, path), 1);
> > +		work_push_retry(-j, path);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> 
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 10:29 [LTP] [PATCH] read_all: retry to queue work for any worker Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 13:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-09 14:29   ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-10-09 14:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Jan Stancek
2019-10-09 15:26   ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-10-11  8:24   ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  5:58     ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:17       ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  6:35         ` Li Wang
2019-10-12  6:49           ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-12  7:28             ` Li Wang
2019-10-13  7:54               ` Jan Stancek
2019-10-14  6:31                 ` Li Wang
2019-10-15 14:15                   ` Jan Stancek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1367025665.5372558.1570631388627.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.