From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49275 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1760342Ab3EBQGT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 May 2013 12:06:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1367510917.32396.91.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Subject: Re: imperfect FIEMAP results on btrfs
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:08:37 +0300
In-Reply-To: <1367510414.32396.90.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
References: <1367510414.32396.90.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 19:00 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Notice 8 vs 16 blocks.

Oh, the kernel is 3.8.6

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy