From: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
To: "wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Handle MLQUEUE busy response in scsi_send_eh_cmnd
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 18:23:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367605401.5981.45.camel@dabdike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503102400.Horde.TQF1IJir309Rg8iARNPkSKA@imap.linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:24 -0400, wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> Quoting Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>:
>
> > scsi_send_eh_cmnd() is calling queuecommand() directly, so
> > it needs to check the return value here.
> > The only valid return codes for queuecommand() are 'busy'
> > states, so we need to wait for a bit to allow the LLDD
> > to recover.
> >
> > Based on an earlier patch from Wen Xiong.
> >
> > Cc: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> >
> Hi James,
>
> I have verified this patch with two new ipr adapters. EEH error can be
> recoery successfully.
> Do you have any question about this new patch?
Yes, it's not correct: stall_for is in jiffies not msec, so
msleep(stall_for) is taking far too long. Plus you don't know that
stall_for is a divisor of timeleft, so timeleft -= stall_for could wrap
and cause the retry loop to go on effectively forever.
I think the below is the correct patch, so I'll commit it unless there
are objections.
James
---
>From a74498dda7acf6f5fb99e43df54f2c1f5c6beec9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:10:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] Handle MLQUEUE busy response in scsi_send_eh_cmnd
scsi_send_eh_cmnd() is calling queuecommand() directly, so
it needs to check the return value here.
The only valid return codes for queuecommand() are 'busy'
states, so we need to wait for a bit to allow the LLDD
to recover.
Based on an earlier patch from Wen Xiong.
[jejb: fix confusion between msec and jiffies values and other issues]
Cc: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index c1b05a8..cfd1ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <scsi/scsi.h>
#include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
@@ -791,22 +792,33 @@ static int scsi_send_eh_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, unsigned char *cmnd,
struct scsi_device *sdev = scmd->device;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
- unsigned long timeleft;
+ unsigned long timeleft = timeout;
struct scsi_eh_save ses;
+ const unsigned long stall_for = min(msecs_to_jiffies(10), 1UL);
int rtn;
+retry:
scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(scmd, &ses, cmnd, cmnd_size, sense_bytes);
shost->eh_action = &done;
scsi_log_send(scmd);
scmd->scsi_done = scsi_eh_done;
- shost->hostt->queuecommand(shost, scmd);
-
- timeleft = wait_for_completion_timeout(&done, timeout);
+ rtn = shost->hostt->queuecommand(shost, scmd);
+ if (rtn) {
+ if (timeleft > stall_for) {
+ scsi_eh_restore_cmnd(scmd, &ses);
+ timeleft -= stall_for;
+ msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(stall_for));
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ timeleft = 0;
+ rtn = NEEDS_RETRY;
+ } else
+ timeleft = wait_for_completion_timeout(&done, timeout);
shost->eh_action = NULL;
- scsi_log_completion(scmd, SUCCESS);
+ scsi_log_completion(scmd, rtn);
SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
printk("%s: scmd: %p, timeleft: %ld\n",
@@ -837,7 +849,7 @@ static int scsi_send_eh_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, unsigned char *cmnd,
rtn = FAILED;
break;
}
- } else {
+ } else if (!rtn) {
scsi_abort_eh_cmnd(scmd);
rtn = FAILED;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-25 6:10 [PATCH] scsi: Handle MLQUEUE busy response in scsi_send_eh_cmnd Hannes Reinecke
2013-05-03 14:24 ` wenxiong
2013-05-03 18:23 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2013-05-04 17:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-05-04 18:20 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367605401.5981.45.camel@dabdike \
--to=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.