From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20])
 by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1UbnL5-0006Q7-6l
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 07:38:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1368430843.5360.13.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/7] mtd: nand-gpio: Convert driver to using
 resource-managed functions
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:40:43 +0300
In-Reply-To: <1368430253.626014749@f244.mail.ru>
References: <1367848434-28493-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru>
 <1368428869.40956565@f27.mail.ru>
 <1368429484.5360.9.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
 <1368430253.626014749@f244.mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Reply-To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:30 +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 17:53 +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > > Patch converts driver to using resource-managed functions.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > 
> > > > Pushed the series to l2-mtd.git, thanks!
> > > 
> > > This series should be applied with one more patch for nand_base:
> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.mtd/46206 
> > 
> > Why is this one dependent on the series? To me it looked completely
> > independent.
> > 
> > > So, please, apply this one if it possible.
> > 
> > In case of a dependency, why it was not a part of the series?
> 
> This is not direct dependency. Single patch for nand_base now
> uses io_xx_rep, nand-gpio series removes this macro and uses
> nand_base implementation. This should not be a problem as nand_base
> have default functions for read/write, so it just improvement.

Ok, that's what I also thought. You wrote in your e-mail that "this
series should be applied with this patch", which sounded like there is a
dependency.

Anyway, all of them are in my tree now, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy