From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Raghavan Subject: PulseAudio and softvol Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:25:44 +0530 Message-ID: <1368611744.6590.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [93.93.135.160]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38A02608D3 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 11:55:45 +0200 (CEST) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hello, A number of users have intermittently(?) been hitting a crash in alsa-lib 1.0.27 [1, 2] related to the softvol plugin. I'm not able to reproduce this reliably, so can't find an easy way to debug/fix. However, this raises a tangential question - why do we need softvol to be plugged for 'front' at all? David explained to me that this is to guarantee the existence of a PCM control. Perhaps I don't fully understand this, because I'm unconvinced by the reason. Could someone explain/refute? This is especially bad for us, from PulseAudio's perspective, because we aren't getting a zero-copy path. Cheers, Arun [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953352 [2] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64299